Free tool · No sign-up

Crypto Signal Credibility Scorecard

Before you risk money on anyone's "alpha" — a Telegram group, a paid newsletter, an influencer, an AI tool — run them through this. Twelve questions across four categories that separate a real, verifiable edge from a screenshot of someone's best week. You get a 0–100 score, a verdict, and the exact gaps to ask about. It runs entirely in your browser, and the full result is yours without an email.

Track recordCan you see — and independently check — every call they've made, wins and losses?

There's a complete public track record — every call, not a curated highlight reel.

Calls are time-stamped and published before the outcome is known.

Losing trades are shown alongside the winners.

The results are independently auditable — an on-chain wallet, exchange-verified PnL, or a third-party tracker.

Setup qualityIs each call an actionable, risk-defined setup, or just a vibe and a ticker?

Each call is a real setup — direction, entry, stop-loss, and target — not just “buy X”.

Position size or risk-per-trade is specified, not left for you to guess.

The reasoning is sourced — data, charts, or on-chain evidence you can check yourself.

A confidence level is attached, and it's calibrated against real outcomes.

Honesty & disclosureDo they tell the truth about risk, or sell certainty that doesn't exist?

There's a plain not-financial-advice / past-performance disclaimer.

No guaranteed returns, no “next 100x”, no countdown-timer urgency to join.

IncentivesDo they make money with you, or off you?

Incentives are disclosed — you know how they make money, and it isn't from your losses.

They don't push thin, low-liquidity tokens they could be dumping on followers.

0 / 12 answered

Credibility score
0/ 100
Red flags

Answer the checklist to score the source. “Not sure” counts as not credible — if you can't verify it, you can't bank on it.

Track record0/11
Setup quality0/7
Honesty & disclosure0/3
Incentives0/4

Want the deeper version? We send an occasional note on vetting signal sources and reading track records — the same list we use for product updates.

Optional. The scorecard above works without it. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

How MarketIntell answers this checklist

We built MarketIntell to pass every line of this — it's the product thesis written down. We're not asking you to take our word for it; the proof lines link to where you can check.

  • Complete, public track record — including the losses verify →
  • Calls time-stamped before the outcome is known verify →
  • Independently auditable — an autonomous bot on a public on-chain wallet verify →
  • Sized setups: direction, entry, stop, targets
  • Sourced reasoning with clickable citations
  • A calibrated confidence score on every answer
  • Plain not-financial-advice disclaimers, no hype
  • Subscription pricing — we make money with you, not off your losses

Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This scorecard is an educational framework, not a rating of any specific provider.

What the four categories measure

Most "signal" pitches lean on the same trick: a wall of winning screenshots and no way to check them. The scorecard is weighted so a verifiable track record carries the most points — a source with slick-looking calls but nothing you can audit can't reach the "Credible" band, no matter how good the marketing is.

Track record
Can you see — and independently check — every call they've made, wins and losses?
Setup quality
Is each call an actionable, risk-defined setup, or just a vibe and a ticker?
Honesty & disclosure
Do they tell the truth about risk, or sell certainty that doesn't exist?
Incentives
Do they make money with you, or off you?

One rule runs through all four: if you can't verify a claim, it scores as zero. "Trust me" is not evidence. That's the same bar MarketIntell holds itself to — every signal we publish lands on a public, time-stamped track record that includes the losses, and an autonomous trading bot runs on a public on-chain wallet anyone can audit.

Frequently asked

Is the crypto signal credibility scorecard free?
Yes. It runs entirely in your browser, there's no sign-up, and the full score and breakdown are shown without an email. You can optionally subscribe to get our vetting notes, but the tool is complete without it.
How is the credibility score calculated?
You answer twelve yes/no/not-sure questions across four categories — track record, setup quality, honesty, and incentives. Each line carries a weight (a verifiable, on-chain or exchange-audited track record carries the most), and the score is the percentage of available points the source earns. A claim you mark “not sure” earns zero, because something you can't verify isn't something you can bank on.
Why does an unverifiable track record drag the score down so much?
Because the record is the proof. Anyone can post great-looking calls after the fact. The points are weighted so that a source with slick setups but no public, time-stamped, loss-inclusive, independently auditable record can't reach the “Credible” band — which is exactly the trap the tool is built to expose.
What's a good credibility score?
80 and above is Credible (verifiable edge — still your risk to manage). 60–79 is Mixed (real, but with gaps). 35–59 is Weak (mostly unverifiable, high caution). Below 35 is Red flags (looks like hype, not edge).
Does MarketIntell pass its own checklist?
That's the point of it. MarketIntell publishes a complete, time-stamped track record including the losses, runs an autonomous trading bot on a public on-chain wallet anyone can audit, returns sized setups with entry, stop, and targets, cites its sources, and attaches a calibrated confidence score. The checklist is the product thesis written down.

This scorecard is an educational framework, not a rating of any specific provider, and not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The score reflects only the answers you give; verify claims independently before risking capital.